Intelligence Report by Wayne Madsen. V for Venezuela.


[Source]

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Security CouncilSept. 14, 2006 -- President George W. Bush is scheduled to speak before the UN General Assembly next week. It will not be a happy occasion for Bush. He will be looking out on an assembly that will be poised to deliver the United States and Mr. Bush a humiliating defeat. The United States is losing in its effort to have Guatemala take over the Latin American seat on the UN Security Council. Venezuela is now favored to win the seat over the objections of US ambassador John Bolton, whose permanent nomination to be ambassador has been killed by the Senate for the current session, and the efforts of Guatemala's Foreign Minister and close Bush administration ally, Gert Rosenthal. Guatemala has among the worst human rights records in Latin America and its government is rife with evangelical fundamentalist Christians and Opus Dei Catholics. Its security services possess the latest in population surveillance technology thanks to Israeli companies like Tadiran.

Venezuela is piling up votes for the Security Council seat and the Bush administration has been powerless to stop President Hugo Chavez's and Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro's diplomatic juggernaut. In fact, Bolton's temperament at the UN has ensured that Venezuela's election to the Security Council is a "slam dunk." If Guatemala, Colombia, Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, and other U.S. Latin American allies are not able to reach a consensus among themselves by October 16 on whether Venezuela or Guatemala gets the seat, the vote will be decided by a two-thirds vote of the 192-member General Assembly, where Venezuela now has a lead. Not only has Venezuela lined up the votes of China and Russia, but as a result of the recent Non-Aligned Meeting in Havana, it can count on the support of a number of nations in the Caribbean, Africa, and the Middle East. Already, countries like Argentina, Brazil, Guyana, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Dominica, Cuba, Belize, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Grenada, Malaysia, Iran, Belarus, Ghana, Mali, Zimbabwe, Syria, and Papua New Guinea have publicly announced their support for Venezuela, while positive pro-Caracas statements have come from Chile, Angola, Myanmar, Vietnam, Qatar, Benin, and India.

Meanwhile, the Bush State Department (the main anti-Venezuela point man is Eric Watnik), Paul Wolfowitz's World Bank, and the new breed of intrusive and bellicose U.S. ambassadors have been strong-arming various countries to support Guatemala over Venezuela -- even by threatening to withhold much-needed economic aid. Haiti and the Dominican Republic are two countries that have been warned by Washington not to vote for Venezuela "or else."

Guatemala can count on the votes of Bush administration allies, who are also supporting U.S. military adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan. They include Canada, Japan, Australia, Israel, Denmark, Poland, Albania, and the United Kingdom. But with the world increasingly seeing a vote for Venezuela as a slap at Bush, Venezuela will continue to gain supporters.

Read more!

TV: Yemen foils attacks on oil refinery


[Source]

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

YEMEN OIL SANAA, Sept. 15 (Xinhua) -- Security forces in Yemen on Friday foiled attempts by unknown gunmen to blow up two oil refineries, killing at least four bombers, the pan-Arabic al-Jazeera TV channel reported.

In the two separate attempts, the gunmen were planning to carry out suicide attacks using four cars, the Qatar-based TV channel said, without giving more details.

Four "terrorists" and one security guard were killed in the attack, other media reports said, but no official confirmation is available at the moment.

Security sources said that the gunmen's targets were an oil refinery in the northeast province of Mareb and an oil storage facility at the Dubba Port in Haramut province.

Yemen, a small oil producer, is due to hold presidential and municipal elections on Sept. 20. Recently, the country has witnessed growing instances of abduction of foreigners, carried out by disgruntled tribesmen to press the government to make concession on their demands.

The Yemeni government, embarrassed by the frequent abductions and unrest, has vowed to crack down on attacks by al-Qaida-linked militants and kidnappings by tribesmen.

Read more!

Ford Plans to Cut 10,000 Salaried Jobs, Person Says (Update1)


[Source]

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

BYEBYE FORDSept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Ford Motor Co., responding to a $1.44 billion first-half loss, plans to cut an additional 10,000 salaried jobs in North America, a person familiar with the company's plans said.

Along with 4,000 salaried jobs the second-largest U.S. automaker eliminated as part of its ``Way Forward'' strategy in January, the additional cuts mean Ford will have slashed almost 40 percent of its salaried workforce in North America by 2008.

Ford will include its expanded plan for salaried job cuts when it discloses its third restructuring in five years today at 7 a.m. New York time, the person said. Instead of shedding at least 40,000 jobs in North America and closing 14 plants by 2012, the company intends to eliminate the jobs by 2008, the person said.

``It's their Way Forward on steroids; it's more and faster with more yet to come,'' said David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Ford has to make major changes, Cole said, because ``all the escape routes are sealed off.''

Ford's job-cutting plans include an agreement with the United Auto Workers union yesterday to offer buyouts of as much as $140,000 to all of its U.S. hourly workers.

``I don't have any comment,'' said Oscar Suris, a spokesman at the automaker's headquarters in Dearborn. ``We'll have more to say when we make our announcement.''

A Profit in 2009

Ford's internal forecasts project global automotive losses may double to more than $8 billion in 2006, four people familiar with the figures have said. Ford has lost market share in the U.S., its home base, every year since 1995.

As part of today's announcement, Ford will drop a pledge made in January to earn a profit on its North American automotive operations in 2008, the person said. Instead, in recognition of the impact of its first-half losses, the company projects a profit on its North American auto operations in 2009, the person said.

Ford will delay other steps such as selling brands or other assets until Alan Mulally, 61, who succeeded Chairman William Clay Ford Jr. as chief executive officer this month, has a chance to study such proposals, the people said.

Today, the company will re-affirm that it considers its Ford Motor Credit Co. finance unit to be a strategic asset that won't be sold, the person said.

Ford is battling falling sales of F-Series pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles, the main sources of its auto profits. After losses in seven of the past eight quarters at the North American automotive unit, Ford is cutting second-half production by 16 percent.

Rival General Motors Corp. stepped up its own efforts to eliminate 30,000 North American jobs, saying in June it will finish the cuts by the start of 2007, two years ahead of schedule.

Norfolk Closure

As part of today's announcements, Ford will specify all 14 North American plants which it intends to close, said the person, who declined to say which plants. The company named five of the plants in January and two more in April.

A Norfolk, Virginia, plant originally scheduled to close in 2008 will shut in 2007, the person said. That factory makes F-150 pickup trucks. Ford also has plants in Dearborn, Michigan, and Kansas City, Missouri that produce the vehicle.

Ford plans to keep a factory in St. Thomas, Ontario, open on one shift to make the Lincoln Town Car, the person said.

To help convince investors that its lineup of future products is sufficient to boost market share, the company will say today that it will introduce a redesigned version of the Super Duty commercial pickup in the first quarter of 2007, plus a redesigned F-150 pickup and new compact cars and sub-compacts in coming years, the person said.

A First Step

Yesterday, Ford and the UAW said more than 75,000 of the union's members will receive buyout or early retirement offers.

``It's a positive first step,'' said John Novak, a Chicago- based analyst with Morningstar Inc. ``It's hard to say that it's going be enough because we don't know where the bottom is for Ford. This should provide a way to downsize the workforce.''

One of the new buyout offers is for as much as $140,000 for employees aged 55 and over with at least 10 years of experience who agree to forgo health-care benefits, according to the union. Another of the eight options is a $35,000 payout to leave the company and maintain health benefits.

Ford has had ``targeted'' buyouts for union workers at specific U.S. plants. Detroit-based GM, also trimming jobs and closing plants in North America, had offered buyouts to all its union workers earlier this year. About 34,000, or one in three, accepted.

UAW Agreement

The UAW agreed to the buyouts and early retirements to avoid involuntary layoffs as Ford reduces the size of its workforce, said Bob King, director of the UAW's Ford department, in a statement distributed to union officials in Detroit.

Workers can apply for buyouts between Oct. 16 and Nov. 27, the UAW said. Workers at an Atlanta plant that closes later this year can apply from Sept. 19 through Oct. 2. Most employees who accept buyouts will depart between Jan. 1 and Sept. 1 of 2007.

Executive Vice President Anne Stevens, 57, and Group Vice President David Szczupak, 51, are retiring, the company said in a statement. Stevens, No. 2 in North America at Ford, had been the highest-ranking woman in the company's 103-year history. Szczupak, the head of manufacturing, held the post for less than a year.

Executive Exits

During the past five years, two North American product development chiefs, two chief financial officers, three North American sales heads and three presidents have left Ford Motor. One of those presidents, Jacques Nasser, was deposed as chief executive by Bill Ford in October 2001.

The automaker's shares fell 10 cents to $9.09 at 4:18 p.m. yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. They have gained 18 percent this year, after a 48 percent decline in 2005.

Ford's 7.45 percent note due in 2031 fell 1 cent to 78.75 cents on the dollar, yielding 9.73 percent, according to Trace, the NASD's bond-price reporting service. The debt closed at 80.5 cents, its highest level in 2006, on Sept. 12.

The perceived risk of owning Ford bonds rose 4.8 percent yesterday, according to traders who bet on the creditworthiness of companies in the credit-default swap market. Ford's five-year credit-default swap rose to $640,000, up from $610,000 Sept. 13, according to data compiled by Credit Suisse Group. The price is up 8.8 percent the past week.



Read more!

US: Defense and oil company executives reap windfalls from Iraq war By Naomi Spencer


[Source]

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.


Our Soldiers


Since September 11, 2001, and the Bush administration’s initiation of the “war on terror,” inequality in the US has grown at a rapid rate and to grotesque proportions. The criminal nature of war on Iraq is reflected in every facet of American life, least surprisingly of all in the enormous fortunes of the ruling elite. Indeed, the current war, the most privatized in history, is viewed by a wide range of corporate executives and investors as an open-ended outsourcing opportunity.

Congress has appropriated more than $314 billion thus far for the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, largely at the expense of infrastructure, education, and other basic requisites for modern life at home. The massive government expenditures and cuts in vital social programs that characterize the US war economy, however, far from fostering restraint on the part of big business, have paved the way for shameless price gouging, corporate windfalls, tax cuts, pension-gutting and pay cuts for average workers in the US.

Results of “Executive Excess 2006,” the thirteenth annual chief executive officer compensation survey by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), underscore the fact that the war has benefited a very few to the detriment of the broad mass of the population, both domestically and internationally.

Business Week estimates that in 1980 the ratio of US executive to worker pay was 42-to-1. IPS found that by 1990 the CEO-worker pay gap had grown to 107-to-1. In the period following 1990, one dominated by unprecedented deregulation and globalization, executive pay soared while workers’ wages by and large stagnated, generating a pay gap of 411-to-1. “If the minimum wage had risen at the same pace as CEO pay since 1990,” the report notes, “it would be worth $22.61 today, rather than the actual $5.15.” Similarly, average worker pay would be more than $108,000 in 2005, rather than $28,314.

After 9/11, pay levels of defense and energy CEOs soared. According to the IPS, CEOs of the top 34 defense contractors saw their average compensation double, from $3.6 million in 2002 to $7.2 million in 2005. Since September 11, these 34 executives have pocketed a combined total of nearly a billion dollars, which the IPS estimates would be “enough to cover the entire wage bill for more than a million Iraqis for a year.” Average defense CEO pay was 308 times the pay received by a deployed US Army private in 2005, $25,000.

George David, CEO of Black Hawk helicopter manufacturer United Technologies, raked in over $200 million between 2002 and 2005, making him the highest paid defense executive. In 2004, David took in $88.3 million in pay and stock options; last year his pay was $31.9 million, still the top defense executive. Boeing CEO W. James McNerney Jr. was not far behind in 2005, with $28.4 million.

The sharp rise in executive pay is directly tied to Pentagon budget increases. Last year alone, government expenditures for military contracts totaled $269 billion. As the ISP points out, the excessive funds have accelerated “the virtual revolving door between the Pentagon and private contractors.” Former Defense Secretary William S. Cohen, for example, resigned in 2001 to become a lobbyist for the defense industry.

Divestitures in military health care contributed to the enormous profits of managed care company Health Net and the fortunes of its top executives. CEO Jay Gellert hauled in over $28 million between 2002 and 2005, a 1,134 percent increase in compensation over the four years prior to war. Gellert is the defense executive posting the biggest pay increase in the IPS survey.

Health Net holds contracts to provide health services to active military personnel as well as mental health counseling and care of wounded troops—profiteering driven by the huge numbers of injuries. The company’s profits have increased by 26 percent since 2003, primarily due to a “risk-sharing” arrangement with the federal government, whereby the Pentagon makes up the difference for costs past the threshold of solvency. If not for this subsidization of contracting, the IPS estimates, Health Net would be running in the red.

The Pentagon has also outsourced intelligence collecting, paramilitary-style training, and management of unsavory and illegal detention facilities. The second-biggest executive pay increase went to Anteon International CEO George Kampf, whose company is responsible for training Coalition troops in prisoner interrogation techniques. According to the financial watchdog group CorpWatch, many of the interrogators working at facilities infamous for torture, including Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib, received their training through Anteon. CEO Kampf’s annual pay package rose from $600,000 before September 11, 2001, to $9 million last year.

The US oil industry has also conspicuously benefited from the war in Iraq, at the expense of the lives tens of thousands of Iraqis and the livelihoods of millions. Within the US, ordinary workers are struggling with drastically higher retail gasoline and residential fuel prices. Meanwhile, chief executives at the fifteen largest American oil companies have received record pay in the years since the “war on terror” was declared.

According to the IPS, these top CEOs claimed an average $32.7 million in compensation last year, 518 times the annual wage of an average oil industry worker. The highest paid executive was William Greehey of top refiner Valero Energy, with $95.2 million. The lowest-paid oil industry worker for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics keeps statistics, a site construction worker, would have to work for 4,279 years before earning as much as CEO Greehey made last year.

Greehey was followed by Occidental Petroleum executive Ray R. Irani, who took in $84 million, and outgoing ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond, who reported $69.7 million. Together, the top 15 saw average pay increases of more than 50 percent in 2005 over 2004.

The Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks lobbying and contributions, reported that the oil industry contributed more than $2.6 million to the reelection campaign of George Bush in 2004. The next highest contribution, worth $305,610, was to the pro-war campaign of Democratic opponent John Kerry. Along with a number of predominantly Southern Republican senators who received large sums from the industry, Bush and Kerry have promoted legislation to serve the interests of big oil, including unserious environmental policies emphasizing voluntary compliance and incentives, deregulation, and in the longer term, conquest of the Middle East.

Last year, ExxonMobil recorded $36 billion in profits, the largest ever recorded. Like all major oil companies in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, ExxonMobil seized on the destruction of the Gulf Coast and the damage to rigs and refineries in the region as a pretense for extreme gouging. CEO Raymond, called to testify before Congress in the face of public outrage, denied profiteering and defended the record profits. He reiterated two persistent lies: that salaries enjoyed by the upper crust were hard earned and justly deserved, and that price hikes were the uncontrollable result of supply and demand.

At the end of the year, Raymond retired, taking nearly $70 million with him for 2005. A few months later, he was awarded a retirement package—including a million dollar consulting contract, security, car and driver, use of a corporate jet, and nearly a quarter million dollars in country club fees—reportedly worth nearly $400 million.

Overall in 2005, the oil industry netted over $140 billion, more than three-quarters of which went to the top five oil companies. So far 2006 has been yet another record-breaking year. ExxonMobil’s second quarter profits were $10.36 billion, 36 percent higher than those of the same period last year.

With so much market share and so much of a critical resource dominated by a handful of corporations, oil companies can effectively shape the market to maximize their profits. The working class is held hostage with arbitrary price increases and artificially suppressed supplies. Currently the Energy Information Administration estimates that American refineries are operating at an average 86 percent capacity, resulting in gasoline production rates of 24 million fewer barrels per day than a year ago.




Read more!